A quick summary of Change and Development in Rural Society (Book 2, Chapter 4) for revision right before the exam: the core definitions, the named facts, and the key structure. Read the full notes separately for detailed explanations and examples.
| Board | Weightage |
|---|---|
| CBSE | 10 marks (Unit 11, 2026-27) |
| Other boards | Check your board’s current syllabus |
1 Agrarian Structure
| Region | Dominant landowning castes |
|---|---|
| Uttar Pradesh | Jats and Rajputs |
| Karnataka | Vokkaligas and Lingayats |
| Andhra Pradesh | Kammas and Reddis |
| Punjab | Jat Sikhs |
2 Land Reforms (1950s-1970s)
Zamindari abolition
Probably the most effective; removed the intermediary layer.
Tenancy acts
Mostly never implemented effectively, except West Bengal and Kerala.
Land Ceiling Acts
“Toothless” in most states: evaded via loopholes and benami transfers.
3 The Green Revolution
Ultimate outcome: “differentiation” (the rich grew richer, many of the poor stagnated or grew poorer). Also: displacement of tenants and service castes; a shift to mono-cropping in most Green Revolution areas; worsened regional inequality, as it was promoted more in the western and southern parts than in the east (Das, 1999). Land reforms, by contrast, had only a limited impact.
4 Post-Independence Rural Change
- More use of agricultural labour (more intensive cultivation)
- Payment in cash instead of kind
- Hereditary (bonded) ties loosen
- A class of “free” wage labourers
Jan Breman: “patronage to exploitation” (1974). DDU Gram Jyoti Yojana: 2014.
5 Circulation of Labour and Globalisation
“Footloose labour” (Breman, 1985): mobile but not free; very poor working and living conditions. Feminisation of agricultural labour. Contract farming (PepsiCo example, tomatoes/potatoes). Farmer suicides since 1997-98: 8,900 (2001-2006, four states).
- Land = productive resource + property + way of life
- Caste and class broadly match, but not exactly: Brahmins, for instance, are usually not major landowners
- Zamindari abolition was probably the most effective of the three land reforms
- Green Revolution raised output but widened inequality (“differentiation”)
- “Footloose labour” is mobile, not free
- Contract farming: security and dependence, together