Note: This chapter is not part of the CBSE Class 12 Sociology syllabus for 2026-27 (CBSE has deleted it). Students of other boards should check their board’s latest syllabus.
A quick summary of The Constitution and Social Change (Book 2, Chapter 3) for revision right before the exam: the key facts, boxes and definitions. Read the full notes separately for detailed explanations and examples.
1 Constitution, Law and Justice
Law
- Essence is force
- Backed by the power of the state
Justice
- Essence is fairness
- The Constitution can extend social justice’s meaning
2 Box 3.1: Supreme Court and Fundamental Rights
| Article | How the Supreme Court stretched it |
|---|---|
| Article 21 | Life and liberty expanded to livelihood, health, shelter, education, dignity |
| Article 19(1)(a) | Right to Information held part of Freedom of Speech (1993) |
| Article 14 | Equal Pay for Equal Work read into the Right to Equality |
3 Panchayati Raj: Key Facts
4 Ambedkar vs Gandhiji on Local Self-Government
Ambedkar
- Warned local elites/upper castes would continue exploiting the downtrodden
Gandhiji
- Ideal: gram-swarajya, each village self-sufficient
5 Panchayat Powers and Nyaya Panchayats
| Area | Facts to remember |
|---|---|
| Powers | Plan economic development; promote social justice schemes; levy/collect taxes, duties, tolls, fees |
| Welfare duties | Burial grounds, birth/death records, child welfare centres, IRDP, ICDS |
| Income | Property/profession/animal/vehicle tax, land-revenue cess, rentals, Zilla Panchayat grants |
| Nyaya Panchayat | Can impose fines, cannot award a sentence; effective against dowry harassment |
6 Panchayati Raj in Tribal Areas
7 Real Grassroots Stories
| Box | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Box 3.3: Kalavati | Dalit panchayat member gains confidence, a name of her own |
| Box 3.4: Van Panchayats | Uttarakhand women fight deforestation; Chipko movement began here |
| Box 3.5: Sukhipur/Dhukipur | Phad storytelling: Bimla (corrupt) vs Najma (good) Pradhan |
Democratisation and inequality: Gram Sabhas are often controlled by a small coterie of rich, upper-caste landlords, leaving the majority as onlookers, not decision-makers.
8 Political Parties, Pressure Groups, Interest Groups
| Term | Core idea | How it’s identified |
|---|---|---|
| Political party | Seeks government power itself, through elections | Contests elections directly |
| Interest group | Lobbies legislative members for specific interests | Does not contest elections |
| Pressure group | Lobbies government directly, does not contest elections | FICCI, ASSOCHAM, INTUC, CITU, Shetkari Sangathan |
Max Weber on parties (paraphrased, Weber 1948: 194): classes belong to the economic order, status groups to the social order, but parties exist purely in a “house of power”. A party’s goal may be a “cause” (a programme for ideal or material purposes) or “personal” (sinecures, i.e. paid posts with little real work, plus power and honour).
- Box 3.1: Article 21 (livelihood/health/shelter/education/dignity), Article 19(1)(a) (RTI, 1993), Article 14 (Equal Pay for Equal Work)
- 73rd Amendment (1992): PRI constitutional status, five-year elections, twenty-lakh population threshold, District Planning Committee
- 73rd + 74th Amendments: 1/3 women’s reservation, 17% of that for SC/ST women, 8,00,000 women brought into the political process 1993-94
- Ambedkar cautioned against unchecked local self-government; Gandhiji’s ideal was gram-swarajya
- Nyaya Panchayats: can fine, cannot sentence
- Meghalaya’s Khasis/Jaintias/Garos and the Durbar Kur sit largely outside the 73rd Amendment; Nongbri warns tribal institutions are not automatically democratic
- Gram Sabhas are often captured by rich, upper-caste coteries
- Kalavati, Van Panchayats/Chipko, Sukhipur-Dhukipur: the three boxed accounts (Kalavati and the phad via Mahila Samakhya)
- Political party vs interest group vs pressure group: know all three apart; Weber’s “house of power” quote