A condensed summary of this chapter for last-minute revision: definitions, numbers, dates, and comparison tables. The full notes are available separately for detailed reading.
1 The Three Ways to Amend, at a Glance
| Method | Procedure | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Simple majority | Ordinary majority in Parliament, no special procedure | Article 2, Article 3 |
| Special majority | Both Houses separately, special majority | Article 368’s general provisions |
| Special majority + ratification by States | + simple majority in half the State legislatures | Federal structure/representation-related provisions |
2 Numbers Worth Remembering
26 Nov 1949 / 26 Jan 1950Constitution adopted / came into force
545 / 273Lok Sabha’s total members / minimum support needed
74 years / 106By 26 January 2024: age of the Constitution / total amendments
| Year | What Happened |
|---|---|
| 1973 | Kesavananda Bharati case: basic structure doctrine put forward |
| 1974-76 | 10 amendments in 3 years (Congress dominance, 352 Lok Sabha seats) |
| 1975 | Emergency declared in June |
| 1976 | 42nd Amendment: the most controversial |
| 1977 | Congress defeated in the elections |
| 1977-78 | 43rd-44th Amendments cancel most of the 42nd’s changes |
| 1980 | Minerva Mills case: basic structure reaffirmed |
| 2000 | Justice Venkatachaliah Commission: review of the Constitution |
| 2001-03 | 10 amendments again in 3 years (coalition-politics period) |
3 Definitions, Exactly as They Should Be Written
All Definitions in One Place
Article 368Gives Parliament the power to amend (add, vary, repeal) the Constitution through its constituent power
Flexible constitutionOne that can be amended easily
Rigid constitutionOne in which amendment is very difficult
Special majorityAt least half of total membership + at least two-thirds of those voting
Basic structure doctrineFrom the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), no amendment can violate the Constitution’s basic structure
Parliamentary sovereigntyThe final say on amendments rests only with elected representatives
4 Two Famous Cases at a Glance
4.1 Kesavananda Bharati versus Minerva Mills
Kesavananda Bharati (1973)
- Basic structure doctrine first put forward
- Set limits on Parliament’s amending power
- Gave the Judiciary the final authority
Minerva Mills (1980)
- Came after the 42nd amendment’s attempt at parliamentary supremacy
- Reaffirmed the basic structure doctrine
- Still dominates interpretation four decades later
4.2 Three Controversial Amendments: 38th, 39th, 42nd
June 1975Emergency declared, the background to all three amendments
5→6 years42nd amendment’s extension of the Lok Sabha’s term
43rd, 44thAmendments that cancelled most of these changes after 1977
Final Recap
- Constitution adopted 26 November 1949, in force 26 January 1950; 69+ years of the same Constitution
- Three amendment methods: simple majority, special majority, special majority + ratification by half the States
- Special majority’s two conditions: half of total membership + two-thirds of those voting; President cannot send an amendment bill back
- 106 amendments by 26 January 2024, 74 years; three categories: technical, interpretive, political consensus
- 38th-39th-42nd most controversial (Emergency era); 43rd-44th reversed the changes
- Basic structure doctrine: Kesavananda Bharati (1973), reaffirmed by Minerva Mills (1980); nowhere written in the Constitution’s text
More for this chapter