- What a political party actually is, and the seven jobs it does in a democracy
- Why a democracy cannot run well without parties, even though people criticise them
- The difference between one-party, two-party and multiparty systems, and why India has the last one
- How the Election Commission decides which parties are “national” and which are “State” parties
- The four challenges facing political parties, and the reforms that have been tried or suggested
1Why Do We Need Political Parties?
Ask any ordinary citizen, even someone who has never read the Constitution and knows nothing about how government works, and they will still know something about political parties. Parties are one of the most visible institutions of a democracy. But visible does not mean popular: most people tend to blame parties for all that is wrong with our democracy and political life, seeing them as partial, partisan and divisive.
That raises a fair question: do we actually need political parties? A century ago, hardly any country had them. Today, hardly any democracy runs without them. To see why, we first need to know what a party actually is.
A political party is a group of people who come together to contest elections and hold power in the government. They agree on some policies and programmes for society, with a view to promoting the collective good.
“Collective good” is itself a contested idea: different people have different views on what is good for society. That is exactly why a party is known by which part of society it stands for, which policies it supports, and whose interests it upholds.
1.1 The three parts of a party
The chapter states that a political party has three components:
- the leaders,
- the active members, and
- the followers.
Partisan: a person strongly committed to a party, group or faction. Partisanship shows up as a tendency to take a side and an inability to take a balanced view.
1.2 What does a political party do?
A party fills political offices and exercises political power by performing a set of functions. The chapter lists exactly seven:
1.3 Do we really need parties?
Imagine, just for a moment, an election with no parties at all: every candidate standing as an independent. No one could promise any major policy change. A government might still form, but its utility would remain ever uncertain; elected representatives would be accountable to their constituency, but nobody would be responsible for how the whole country is run. This thought experiment, not a real historical situation, is exactly how the chapter explains why modern representative democracies cannot function without parties.
Real-world evidence backs this up: in the non-party based elections to the panchayat in many states, parties do not contest formally, yet the village generally gets split into more than one faction, and each faction puts up a “panel” of its candidates. That is exactly what a party does, even when it isn’t officially called one.
The rise of political parties is directly linked to the emergence of representative democracies. As societies became large and complex, they needed some agency to gather different views on various issues and to present these to the government, and a way to bring representatives together so that a responsible government could be formed. Parties fulfil these needs.
Parties turn many opinions into a few workable choices.
No government can act on a thousand different individual views. A party’s real job is to group similar opinions together so that policies can actually be made. That is why the chapter calls parties “a necessary condition for a democracy.”
Ruling Party: the political party that runs the government.
2How Many Parties Should We Have?
In a democracy, any group of citizens is formally free to form a political party. More than 750 parties are registered with the Election Commission of India, though usually only a handful are effectively in the race to win elections and form the government. So how many major parties are actually good for a democracy?
2.1 One-party and two-party systems
One-party system
- Only one party is allowed to run the government (e.g. the Communist Party in China)
- Not a democratic option: a democracy must allow at least two parties a fair chance to compete
Two-party system
- Power usually alternates between two main parties
- Others may exist and win a few seats, but only the two main ones have a serious chance of a majority
- Examples: the USA and the UK
A multiparty system exists when several parties compete for power, and more than two have a reasonable chance of winning, either on their own or in alliance with others. India has a multiparty system. When several parties in such a system join hands to contest and win an election together, this is called an alliance or a front.
Coalition: in a multiparty system, the government is formed by various parties coming together in a coalition.
In the 2004 parliamentary elections, India saw three major alliances: the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) and the Left Front.
The multiparty system often appears very messy and leads to political instability; at the same time, it allows a variety of interests and opinions to enjoy political representation. No party system is a country’s deliberate choice: it evolves over a long time, shaped by a society’s own nature, its social and regional divisions, its political history and its election system. India has evolved a multiparty system because the social and geographical diversity in such a large country is not easily absorbed by two or even three parties. No system is ideal for all countries and all situations.
The chapter applies this to the States of India too. It names three major types of party systems that exist at the State level, and asks you to find the names of at least two States for each:
- Two-party system
- Multiparty system with two alliances
- Multiparty system
The chapter itself does not name the States, so use recent election results to find examples.
3Popular Participation in Political Parties
It is often said that parties are in crisis because they are very unpopular and citizens are indifferent to them. Large-sample surveys conducted over several decades, reported in the SDSA Team’s State of Democracy in South Asia (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2007), show this belief is only partly true for India.
3.1 What the surveys show
What the survey found true
- Participation in party activities is fairly high: the proportion who said they were members of some political party was higher in India than in many advanced countries like Canada, Japan, Spain and South Korea
- Over the last three decades, the proportion of party members in India has gone up steadily, and the proportion who feel “close to a political party” has also gone up
What the survey also found true
- Political parties do not enjoy much trust in South Asia: more people report “not much” or “not at all” trust than “some” or “great” trust
- Worldwide too, parties are one of the least trusted institutions
So low trust and high participation exist side by side. Earlier in the chapter, while explaining the seventh function, the book notes that people feel close to parties “even when they do not fully trust them”, because a local party leader is easier to approach than a government officer.
4National Parties
Federal democracies everywhere tend to have two kinds of parties: those present in only one federal unit, and those present in several or all units, called national parties. India follows the same pattern. Every party must register with the Election Commission, which treats all parties equally but gives special facilities, including a unique election symbol reserved for that party’s official candidates, to large, established “recognised political parties.”
| Type | Recognition criteria |
|---|---|
| State party | At least 6% of total votes in a State’s Legislative Assembly election, AND wins at least 2 seats |
| National party | At least 6% of total votes in Lok Sabha elections, OR in Assembly elections across 4 States, AND wins at least 4 seats in the Lok Sabha |
According to this classification, there are six recognised national parties in the country, as per the notification of the Election Commission of India issued in 2023: AAP, BJP, BSP, CPI-M, INC and NPP.
4.1 The six recognised national parties
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)
Formed 26 November 2012, after the 2011 anti-corruption movement, on the idea of accountability, clean administration, transparency and good governance. In the year after its formation it emerged as the second largest party in the Delhi Legislative Assembly election and formed a government with INC support; it emerged as the third front in Gujarat after the 2022 Assembly election, and has formed governments in Punjab and Delhi. 2019 Lok Sabha: 1 seat.
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
Founded 1980, reviving the earlier Bharatiya Jana Sangh (founded 1951 by Syama Prasad Mukherjee). Draws on India’s ancient culture and Deendayal Upadhyaya’s “integral humanism”; cultural nationalism (“Hindutva”) is a key element. Wants J&K’s full integration, a uniform civil code and a ban on religious conversions. Emerged as the largest party with 303 seats in 2019 and leads the ruling NDA at the Centre.
Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP)
Formed 1984 under Kanshi Ram, representing the “bahujan samaj”: dalits, adivasis, OBCs and religious minorities. Draws inspiration from Sahu Maharaj, Mahatma Phule, Periyar Ramaswami Naicker and Babasaheb Ambedkar. Main base Uttar Pradesh, with substantial presence in neighbouring states; formed UP’s government several times with the support of different parties at different times. 2019 Lok Sabha: about 3.63% votes, 10 seats.
Communist Party of India (Marxist), CPI-M
Founded 1964; believes in Marxism-Leninism, supports socialism, secularism and democracy, opposes imperialism and communalism. Strong in West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura; ruled West Bengal for 34 unbroken years. 2019 Lok Sabha: about 1.75% votes, 3 seats.
Indian National Congress (INC)
One of the world’s oldest parties, founded 1885. Under Jawaharlal Nehru sought a modern, secular, democratic republic. Ruled the Centre till 1977 and again 1980-1989; support declined after 1989 but remains present countrywide. Centrist, espouses secularism and welfare of weaker sections and minorities; supports new economic reforms but with a human face. Led the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government from 2004 to 2014. 2019 Lok Sabha: 19.5% votes, 52 seats.
National People’s Party (NPP)
Formed July 2013 under P.A. Sangma, the first party from North East India to attain national party status. Believes in the country’s diversity and region-specific development needs. Formed government in Meghalaya; present in many North Eastern states. 2019 Lok Sabha: 1 seat.
Do not write CPI (the plain Communist Party of India, without “Marxist”) as one of the six national parties: this reprint of the book names only the six above. Only CPI-M is on the list.

5State Parties
Other than the national parties, most of the major parties of the country are classified by the Election Commission as “State parties,” commonly called regional parties. But the book is explicit: these parties need not be regional in ideology or outlook. Some of these parties are all India parties that happen to have succeeded only in some states. The book’s map of State parties (page 56) gives details of these parties.
| State party | Book’s own note |
|---|---|
| Samajwadi Party | National-level organisation, with units in several states |
| Rashtriya Janata Dal | National-level organisation, with units in several states |
| Biju Janata Dal | Conscious of its State identity |
| Sikkim Democratic Front | Conscious of its State identity |
| Mizo National Front | Conscious of its State identity |
| Telangana Rashtra Samithi | Conscious of its State identity |
Over the last three decades, State parties have grown in number and strength, making Parliament more diverse. In fact, no national party could win a Lok Sabha majority on its own until 2014, so national parties were compelled to ally with State parties. Since 1996, nearly every State party has had a chance to be part of a national coalition government, which the book says has strengthened both federalism and democracy in the country.
6Challenges to Political Parties
Because parties are democracy’s most visible face, people naturally blame them first when democracy’s working goes wrong. Popular dissatisfaction, in India and worldwide, centres on four problem areas.
On the first challenge: parties do not keep membership registers, do not hold organisational meetings, and do not conduct internal elections regularly. Ordinary members do not get sufficient information on what happens inside the party and have no means or connections to influence its decisions. Those who disagree with the leadership find it difficult to continue in the party. Power concentrates with one or a few leaders, and loyalty to the leader becomes more important than loyalty to the party’s own principles.
The second challenge follows from the first: without transparent internal procedures, leaders can favour people close to them, including their own family, for top positions. This is unfair to other members, and bad for democracy, because people with little experience or public support end up holding power.
The third challenge is money and criminal influence, especially at election time: parties tend to nominate candidates who already have, or can raise, large sums, and rich people and companies who give funds to parties tend to have influence on the party’s policies and decisions. In some cases, parties support criminals who can win elections.
The chapter’s cartoon “Berlusconi Puppet Theatre” (page 57) illustrates this. Berlusconi was the Prime Minister of Italy and also one of its top businessmen: his company owns TV channels, the most important publishing company, a football club (AC Milan) and a bank.
The fourth challenge is the lack of a meaningful choice for voters. A meaningful choice needs parties to be genuinely different from one another, but in recent years there has been a decline in the ideological differences among parties in most parts of the world. The book’s own example: the difference between Britain’s Labour Party and Conservative Party is very little; they agree on more fundamental aspects and differ only in details of how policies are framed and implemented. In our country too, the differences among all the major parties on economic policies have reduced. Sometimes people cannot even elect very different leaders, because the same set of leaders keep shifting from one party to another.
Defection: changing party allegiance from the party on which a person got elected (to a legislative body) to a different party.
7How Can Parties Be Reformed?
The chapter poses this as a genuine open question, not a settled answer: are parties willing to reform, and if not, can citizens force them to? Three concrete steps have already been taken.
7.1 Reforms already tried
Anti-defection law
A constitutional amendment made an MLA/MP who changes parties lose their seat. This reduced defection, but also made dissent within a party harder: members must now accept whatever the leadership decides.
Mandatory affidavits
A Supreme Court order requires every candidate to file a signed affidavit disclosing property and pending criminal cases. This made more information public, but there is no system to verify if the disclosed information is true.
EC order on internal elections
Parties must now hold organisational elections and file income tax returns. They have started doing so, but sometimes it is mere formality: it is not clear if this step has led to greater internal democracy.
Affidavit: a signed document submitted to an officer, in which a person makes a sworn statement about their own personal information.
Beyond these, the chapter records suggestions that have not yet been accepted by political parties: a law regulating parties’ own internal affairs (a compulsory member register, following their own constitution, an independent authority for disputes, open elections to top posts); a mandatory minimum of about one-third of tickets, plus a quota in decision-making bodies, for women; and state funding of elections, in kind (petrol, paper, telephone) or in cash based on votes won last time.
“We must be very careful about legal solutions to political problems.” Over-regulating parties can backfire: they would only find ways around the law, and they will not pass a law they dislike.
The chapter’s own caution against expecting the law alone to fix this
Two other routes to reform, neither one requiring new law: ordinary citizens can put pressure on parties through petitions, publicity and agitation; and people who want better politics can join a political party themselves, since the quality of democracy depends on how much people actually participate in it. The chapter says: “The problem of bad politics can be solved by more and better politics.” It returns to this theme in its final chapter.
- A political party contests elections and holds power, built on leaders, active members and followers
- Parties perform 7 functions: contest elections, offer policies, make laws, form governments, oppose, shape opinion, give access to welfare schemes
- One-party systems are not a democratic option; two-party (USA, UK) and multiparty (India) are the other types; no country chooses its party system, which evolves over a long time
- National party = 6% Lok Sabha/4-State-Assembly votes + 4 LS seats; State party = 6% State Assembly votes + 2 seats
- Six recognized national parties (2023 EC list): AAP, BJP, BSP, CPI-M, INC, NPP
- State parties need not be regional in ideology: Samajwadi Party, RJD, BJD, Sikkim Democratic Front, Mizo National Front, TRS
- Four challenges: lack of internal democracy, dynastic succession, money/muscle power, no meaningful choice
- Reforms tried: anti-defection law, mandatory affidavits, EC-ordered internal elections, each with a known gap
- Reforms not yet accepted: internal-affairs law, one-third tickets for women, state funding of elections
- Can I list all 7 functions of a political party without looking?
- Can I state both recognition thresholds (State party and National party) exactly?
- Can I name all six national parties and one fact about each?
- Can I explain all four challenges, and the trade-off in each of the three reforms already tried?